Page 37 - EE Times Europe Magazine - June 2025
P. 37

EE|Times EUROPE   37

         How a Standardized Approach Can Accelerate Development of Safety and Security in Automotive Imaging Systems


           such as I C, GPIO, Ethernet, and Serial
                 2
           Peripheral Interface for command and
           control.                                                                                    Figure 2:
          •  SerDes physical layer. MIPI A-PHY is                                                      Example of
           the first industry-standard, long-reach,                                                    MIPI end-
           asymmetric SerDes interface with high                                                       to-end data
           noise immunity. Designed specifically for                                                   protection
           the automotive industry, it eliminates                                                      over a
           the need for proprietary asymmetric                                                         SerDes
           interfaces and bridges, thereby simplify-                                                   bridge
           ing IVN design and reducing the cost and
           cable harness weight. Short-reach MIPI                                                      (Source:
                                                                                                       MIPI Alliance)
           C-/D-PHY may also be used, and outside
           of the MASS framework, other MIPI-
           approved PHYs may be used within the
           image sensor stack.
          •  Functional safety. Features are provided
           to meet the requirements of ISO 26262
           and enable designers to build systems
           that meet common Automotive Safety
           Integrity Level (ASIL) risks, from ASIL-B
           through ASIL-D.
          •  Security. Incorporation of the MIPI   functionality is enabled at the application   •  Choice of tag modes. Multiple tag mode
           Camera Security Framework (see “A   layer, data protection is applied end-to-end   options let implementers choose how
           framework for camera security” section)   from the source of sensor data in the image   often the security tag is computed and
           enables security functionality, including   sensor to the image data sink in the sensor’s   transmitted.
           authentication of system components,   corresponding ECU. In this case, data pro-  •  Granular security controls. Granular
           data integrity protection, and data   tection is agnostic of the IVN topology and   source-selective control over the dif-
           encryption.                      can be run over any MIPI-approved physical   ferent segments of each CSI-2 image
          Figure 1 shows a “stack” of the image-   layer interface.                frame enables a sliding scale of security
        sensor-related components within the MASS                                  protection.
        framework.                          A FRAMEWORK FOR CAMERA SECURITY       •  Functional safety and security. When
                                            MASS also leverages the MIPI Camera    both security and functional safety are
        ADDRESSING FUNCTIONAL               Security Framework, a suite of specifications   enabled, security is layered on top of
        SAFETY REQUIREMENTS                 offering a set of service extensions that can be   functional safety. From a source (or trans-
        The MASS framework includes functionality   applied anywhere the CSI-2 imaging protocol   mitter) perspective, security is applied
        to meet the requirements laid out in ISO   is used. Like the functional safety extensions,   to the image data first, followed by the
        26262, enabling systems that meet the single   the camera security framework can be run   application of functional safety.
        point fault metric and latent fault metric   over any MIPI-approved physical layer to   •  Protection of command and control
        defined in the respective ASIL scheme, from   provide end-to-end security for camera data   interfaces. Defining security services
        ASIL-B through ASIL-D. Functional safety and   streams and I C camera command and control   enables data integrity protection and
                                                      2
        security (described in the next section) can be   interfaces. It provides flexibility to balance   optional encryption of camera command
        applied end-to-end, as shown in Figure 2.  required security functionality against pro-  and control interfaces.
          The functionality is defined within the   cessing efficiency, thermal regulation, and   The development of a standardized
        MIPI Camera Service Extensions and MIPI   power consumption. Features include:  approach to functional safety and security
        Command and Control Interface Service   •  Choice of ciphersuites. Options include   in automotive imaging systems provides
        Extensions specifications, which extend the   an “efficiency” ciphersuite, providing   several benefits to the automotive industry,
        MIPI CSI-2 protocol to enable functional   data integrity only (no encryption) and   including reducing cost and complexity
        safety at the application layer. Functional-  targeted toward sensors with limited   within electronic systems and driving econ-
        ity includes cyclic redundancy checks for   hardware resources, and a “performance”   omies of scale while introducing advanced
        integrity protection, a message counter to   ciphersuite, which provides data integrity   technologies.
        detect packet loss, and a timeout monitor to   and optional encryption aimed at sensors   MIPI offers a variety of resources to devel-
        detect loss of communication. Because this   with dedicated hardware support.  opers interested in learning more about these
                                                                                frameworks, including two comprehensive
                                                                                white papers: “An Introductory Guide to MIPI
                                                                                Automotive SerDes Solutions (MASS)” and “A
                                                                                Guide to the MIPI Camera Security Framework
                                                                                for Automotive Applications.” ■

                                                                                Philip Hawkes and Rick Wietfeldt are
                                                                                co-chairs of the MIPI Security Working Group,
                                                                                and Hiroo Takahashi is the MIPI Camera
                                                                                Service Extensions subgroup lead, all at MIPI
        Figure 1: MIPI image sensor stack (Source: MIPI Alliance)               Alliance.


                                                                                         www.eetimes.eu | JUNE 2025
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42